In this decision, the Federal Supreme Court had to determine whether a broker who had merely identified the buyer could nevertheless claim commission after a second broker completed the transaction. The Federal Supreme Court considered that the second agreement concluded between the client and the first broker only amended the initial contract, that the first broker’s activity had no causal effect on the sale, and that the contractual provision relied upon was not clear enough to derogate from Art. 413 para. 1 SCO.