Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture : a clinical practice guideline
ContributorsRochwerg, Bram; Almenawer, Saleh A; Siemieniuk, Reed A C; Vandvik, Per Olav; Agoritsas, Thomas
; Lytvyn, Lyubov; Alhazzani, Waleed; Archambault, Patrick
; D'Aragon, Frederick; Darbellay, Pauline; Guyatt, Gordon; Laake, Jon Henrik
; Beltrán-Arroyave, Claudia; McCredie, Victoria
; Price, Amy
; Chabot, Christian; Zervakis, Tracy; Badhiwala, Jetan
; St-Onge, Maude; Szczeklik, Wojciech
; Møller, Morten Hylander; Lamontagne, Francois
Published inBMJ. British medical journal, vol. 361, k1920
First online date2018-05-22
Keywords
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Equipment Design / economics
- Humans
- Needles / economics
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache / prevention & control
- Spinal Puncture / adverse effects
- Spinal Puncture / instrumentation
Affiliation entities
Citation (ISO format)
ROCHWERG, Bram et al. Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture : a clinical practice guideline. In: BMJ. British medical journal, 2018, vol. 361, p. k1920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1920
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Identifiers
- PID : unige:185710
- DOI : 10.1136/bmj.k1920
- PMID : 29789372
- PMCID : PMC6364256
Additional URL for this publicationhttps://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.k1920
Journal ISSN0959-8138
