Proper scoring rules are an essential tool to assess the predictive performance of probabilistic forecasts. However, propriety alone does not ensure an informative characterization of predictive performance, and it is recommended to compare forecasts using multiple scoring rules. With that in mind, interpretable scoring rules providing complementary information are necessary. We formalize a framework based on aggregation and transformation to build interpretable multivariate proper scoring rules. Aggregation-and-transformation-based scoring rules can target application-specific features of probabilistic forecasts, which improves the characterization of the predictive performance. This framework is illustrated through examples taken from the weather forecasting literature, and numerical experiments are used to showcase its benefits in a controlled setting. Additionally, the framework is tested on real-world data of postprocessed wind speed forecasts over central Europe. In particular, we show that it can help bridge the gap between proper scoring rules and spatial verification tools.