Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury

Errata
  • During a review of the data, the authors discovered that an outcome for one patient was inaccurate: the patient was reported as alive at 90 days but was subsequently confirmed to have died 83 days after randomization. This error affected numbers in the Abstract, the Results section, Table 2, and Figures 1 and 2 but did not alter the main findings.
  • DOI : 10.1056/nejmx200016
  • PMID : 32672427
Published inThe New England journal of medicine, vol. 383, no. 3, p. 240-251
Publication date2020-07-16
Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients, many of whom receive renal-replacement therapy. However, the most effective timing for the initiation of such therapy remains uncertain.

Methods: We conducted a multinational, randomized, controlled trial involving critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an accelerated strategy of renal-replacement therapy (in which therapy was initiated within 12 hours after the patient had met eligibility criteria) or a standard strategy (in which renal-replacement therapy was discouraged unless conventional indications developed or acute kidney injury persisted for >72 hours). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 90 days.

Results: Of the 3019 patients who had undergone randomization, 2927 (97.0%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (1465 in the accelerated-strategy group and 1462 in the standard-strategy group). Of these patients, renal-replacement therapy was performed in 1418 (96.8%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 903 (61.8%) in the standard-strategy group. At 90 days, death had occurred in 643 patients (43.9%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 639 (43.7%) in the standard-strategy group (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.09; P = 0.92). Among survivors at 90 days, continued dependence on renal-replacement therapy was confirmed in 85 of 814 patients (10.4%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 49 of 815 patients (6.0%) in the standard-strategy group (relative risk, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.43). Adverse events occurred in 346 of 1503 patients (23.0%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 245 of 1489 patients (16.5%) in the standard-strategy group (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, an accelerated renal-replacement strategy was not associated with a lower risk of death at 90 days than a standard strategy. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; STARRT-AKI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02568722.).

Keywords
  • Acute Kidney Injury / mortality
  • Acute Kidney Injury / therapy
  • Aged
  • Critical Illness / therapy
  • Humans
  • Intention to Treat Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Replacement Therapy / adverse effects
  • Time-to-Treatment
  • Treatment Outcome
Funding
  • Department of Health [17/42/74]
  • Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health [2015 Industry-Partnered Operating Grant with Baxte]
  • National Health and Medical Research Council [2016 Project Grant 1127121]
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme [2018 Reference Number: 17/42/74]
  • Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health [2015 Open Operating Grant [MOP142296]]
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand [2017 Project Grant 17/204]
  • Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health [2017 Project Grant [389635]]
Citation (ISO format)
BAGSHAW, Sean M et al. Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. In: The New England journal of medicine, 2020, vol. 383, n° 3, p. 240–251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000741
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Secondary files (1)
Supplemental data
accessLevelPublic
Updates (1)
Erratum
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Additional URL for this publicationhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2000741
Journal ISSN0028-4793
55views
170downloads

Technical informations

Creation10/02/2025 11:55:50
First validation10/03/2025 10:47:08
Update24/03/2026 08:53:05
Status update24/03/2026 08:53:05
Last indexation24/03/2026 08:54:22
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack