Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol : which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives ?

Publication date2024-02
First online date2023-12-14
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the different present and future therapeutic β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) alternatives, namely aztreonam-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and sulbactam-durlobactam against clinical isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Methods: MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were determined for 67, 9, and 11 clinical Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii isolates, respectively, showing MIC values of cefiderocol being ≥1 mg/L. If unavailable, the respective β-lactam breakpoints according to EUCAST were used for BL/BLI combinations.

Results: For Enterobacterales, the susceptibility rates for aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 7.5%, 0%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively, while they were much higher for cefepime-zidebactam (91%), cefiderocol-zidebactam (91%), meropenem-nacubactam (71.6%), cefiderocol-nacubactam (74.6%), and cefiderocol-taniborbactam (76.1%), as expected. For P. aeruginosa isolates, the higher susceptibility rates were observed for imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol-zidebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam (56% for all combinations). For A. baumannii isolates, lower susceptibility rates were observed with commercially or under development BL/BLI combos; however, a high susceptibility rate (70%) was found for sulbactam-durlobactam and when cefiderocol was associated to some BLIs.

Conclusions: Zidebactam- and nacubactam-containing combinations showed a significant in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol. On the other hand, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest susceptibility rates against P. aeruginosa isolates. Finally, sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were the only effective options against A. baumannii tested isolates.

Keywords
  • Avibactam
  • Cefiderocol
  • Nacubactam
  • Relebactam
  • Taniborbactam
  • Vaborbactam
  • Zidebactam
  • Β-Lactamase
  • Humans
  • Meropenem / pharmacology
  • Cefepime
  • Aztreonam / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Cephalosporins / pharmacology
  • Imipenem / pharmacology
  • Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors / pharmacology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Beta-Lactamases
  • Carboxylic Acids
  • Piperidines
  • Lactams
  • Boronic Acids
  • Cyclooctanes
  • Azabicyclo Compounds
  • Borinic Acids
Citation (ISO format)
LE TERRIER, Christophe et al. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol : which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives ? In: European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2024, vol. 43, n° 2, p. 339–354. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04732-4
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (1)
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0934-9723
48views
133downloads

Technical informations

Creation03/11/2024 19:32:31
First validation13/02/2025 11:07:20
Update13/02/2025 11:07:20
Status update13/02/2025 11:07:20
Last indexation13/02/2025 11:07:25
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack