Scientific article
Review
OA Policy
English

Material and abutment selection for CAD / CAM implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients – A narrative review

Published inClinical oral implants research, vol. 35, no. 8, p. 984-999
Publication date2024-08
First online date2024-06-12
Abstract

Restorative material selection has become increasingly challenging due to the speed of new developments in the field of dental material science. The present narrative review gives an overview of the current indications for implant abutments and restoration materials for provisional and definitive implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients. For single implant restorations, titanium base abutments for crowns are suggested as an alternative to the conventional stock- and customized abutments made out of metal or zirconia. They combine the mechanical stability of a metallic connection with the esthetic potential of ceramics. For multiple-unit restorations, conical titanium bases especially designed for bridges are recommended, to compensate for deviating implant insertion axes and angulations. Even though titanium base abutments with different geometries and heights are available, certain clinical scenarios still benefit from customized titanium abutments. Indications for the definitive material in fixed implant restorations depend on the region of tooth replacement. In the posterior (not esthetically critical) zone, ceramics such as zirconia (3-5-Ymol%) and lithium-disilicate are recommended to be used in a monolithic fashion. In the anterior sector, ceramic restorations may be buccally micro-veneered for an optimal esthetic appearance. Lithium-disilicate is only recommended for single-crowns, while zirconia (3-5-Ymol%) is also recommended for multiple-unit and cantilever restorations. Attention must be given to the specific mechanical properties of different types of zirconia, as some feature reduced mechanical strengths and are therefore not indicated for all regions and restoration span lengths. Metal-ceramics remain an option, especially for cantilever restorations.

Keywords
  • CAD‐CAM
  • Implant‐supported
  • Dental abutments
  • Dental implants
  • Dental prosthesis
  • Ceramics / chemistry
  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Crowns
  • Dental Abutments
  • Dental Implant-Abutment Design
  • Dental Materials / chemistry
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
  • Denture, Partial, Fixed
  • Humans
  • Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • Zirconium / chemistry
  • Dental Materials
  • Zirconium
  • Zirconium oxide
  • Titanium
Citation (ISO format)
STRASDING, Malin et al. Material and abutment selection for CAD / CAM implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients – A narrative review. In: Clinical oral implants research, 2024, vol. 35, n° 8, p. 984–999. doi: 10.1111/clr.14315
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0905-7161
50views
43downloads

Technical informations

Creation22/01/2025 16:56:59
First validation29/01/2025 16:15:51
Update time29/01/2025 16:15:51
Status update29/01/2025 16:15:51
Last indexation10/06/2025 21:58:53
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack