Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Impact of intensive prone position therapy on outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19

Errata
CollaboratorsSuh, Noémie
Published inAnnals of intensive care, vol. 14, no. 1, 100
Publication date2024-06-27
First online date2024-06-27
Abstract

Background: Previous retrospective research has shown that maintaining prone positioning (PP) for an average of 40 h is associated with an increase of survival rates in intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study aims to determine whether a cumulative PP duration of more than 32 h during the first 2 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission is associated with increased survival compared to a cumulative PP duration of 32 h or less.

Methods: This study is an ancillary analysis from a previous large international observational study involving intubated patients placed in PP in the first 48 h of ICU admission in 149 ICUs across France, Belgium and Switzerland. Given that PP is recommended for a 16-h daily duration, intensive PP was defined as a cumulated duration of more than 32 h during the first 48 h, whereas standard PP was defined as a duration equal to or less than 32 h. Patients were followed-up for 90 days. The primary outcome was mortality at day 60. An Inverse Probability Censoring Weighting (IPCW) Cox model including a target emulation trial method was used to analyze the data.

Results: Out of 2137 intubated patients, 753 were placed in PP during the first 48 h of ICU admission. The intensive PP group (n = 79) had a median PP duration of 36 h, while standard PP group (n = 674) had a median of 16 h during the first 48 h. Sixty-day mortality rate in the intensive PP group was 39.2% compared to 38.7% in the standard PP group (p = 0.93). Twenty-eight-day and 90-day mortality as well as the ventilator-free days until day 28 were similar in both groups. After IPCW, there was no significant difference in mortality at day 60 between the two-study groups (HR 0.95 [0.52-1.74], p = 0.87 and HR 1.1 [0.77-1.57], p = 0.61 in complete case analysis or in multiple imputation analysis, respectively).

Conclusions: This secondary analysis of a large multicenter European cohort of intubated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 found that intensive PP during the first 48 h did not provide a survival benefit compared to standard PP.

Keywords
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • COVID-19
  • Intensive care unit
  • Intensive prone position
  • Intubation
  • Mortality
Citation (ISO format)
LE TERRIER, Christophe et al. Impact of intensive prone position therapy on outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19. In: Annals of intensive care, 2024, vol. 14, n° 1, p. 100. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01340-z
Main files (1)
Article (Published version) - after correction
Secondary files (1)
Supplemental data
accessLevelPublic
Updates (1)
Erratum
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN2110-5820
85views
345downloads

Technical informations

Creation03/11/2024 19:32:09
First validation04/12/2024 14:48:27
Update19/03/2026 14:36:59
Status update19/03/2026 14:36:59
Last indexation19/03/2026 14:37:00
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack