Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice

Ceva, Emanuela

doi:10.1007/s11158-009-9092-4

Scientific article

English

Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice

ContributorsCeva, Emanuela

Published inRes publica, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 219-235

Publication date2009-08-26

First online date2009-08-26

Affiliation entities

Faculté des sciences de la société / Département de science politique et relations internationales
Faculté des sciences de la société / Institut d'études de la citoyenneté

Citation (ISO format)

CEVA, Emanuela. Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice. In: Res publica, 2009, vol. 15, n° 3, p. 219–235. doi: 10.1007/s11158-009-9092-4

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

PID : unige:181025
DOI : 10.1007/s11158-009-9092-4

Additional URL for this publicationhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11158-009-9092-4

Journal ISSN1356-4765

58views

137downloads

Creation23/10/2024 11:23:24

First validation28/10/2024 08:25:15

Update03/12/2024 17:08:29

Status update03/12/2024 17:08:29

Last indexation03/12/2024 17:08:30

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice

Technical informations