Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Romosozumab followed by denosumab versus denosumab only : a post hoc analysis of FRAME and FRAME extension

Published inJournal of bone and mineral research, vol. 39, no. 9, p. 1268-1277
Publication date2024-09-02
Abstract

Osteoanabolic-first treatment sequences are superior to oral bisphosphonates for fracture reduction and bone mineral density (BMD) gain. However, data comparing osteoanabolic medications, with the more potent antiresorptive, denosumab (DMAb), are limited. We analyzed FRAME and FRAME Extension data to assess BMD and fracture incidence in patients treated with romosozumab (Romo) followed by DMAb (Romo/DMAb) versus DMAb (DMAb/DMAb) for 24 months. In FRAME, women aged ≥55 years (total hip [TH] or femoral neck [FN] T-score: -2.5 to -3.5) were randomized to Romo or placebo for 12 months followed by DMAb for 12 months. In FRAME Extension, both cohorts received DMAb for another 12 months. This post hoc analysis compared BMD change and fracture incidence in patients on Romo/DMAb (months 0-24) versus DMAb/DMAb (months 12-36). Patient characteristics were balanced by propensity score weighting (PSW) and sensitivity analyses were conducted using PSW with multiple imputation (PSW-MI) and propensity score matching (PSM). Unmeasured confounding was addressed using E-values. After PSW, over 24 months, compared with DMAb/DMAb, treatment with Romo/DMAb produced significantly greater BMD increases at the lumbar spine [LS], TH, and FN (mean differences: 9.3%, 4.4%, and 4.1%, respectively; all p<0.001). At month 24, in women with a baseline T-score of -3.0, the probability of achieving a T-score > -2.5 was higher with Romo/DMAb versus DMAb/DMAb (LS: 92% versus 47%; TH: 50% versus 5%). In the Romo/DMAb versus DMAb/DMAb cohorts, new vertebral fractures were significantly reduced (0.62% versus 1.26% [odds ratio = 0.45; p=0.003]) and rates of clinical, nonvertebral, and hip fractures were lower (differences not significant). Similar BMD and fracture outcomes were observed with PSW-MI and PSM sensitivity analyses. The sequence of Romo/DMAb resulted in greater BMD gains and higher probability of achieving T-scores > -2.5, significantly reduced new vertebral fracture incidence, and numerically lowered the incidence (not significant) of clinical, nonvertebral, and hip fractures versus DMAb only through 24 months.

Keywords
  • Anabolics
  • Antiresorptives
  • Clinical trials
  • Menopause
  • Osteoporosis
  • Humans
  • Denosumab / therapeutic use
  • Denosumab / pharmacology
  • Female
  • Bone Density / drug effects
  • Aged
  • Middle Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / pharmacology
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use
  • Fractures, Bone / epidemiology
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents / therapeutic use
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents / pharmacology
Citation (ISO format)
COSMAN, Felicia et al. Romosozumab followed by denosumab versus denosumab only : a post hoc analysis of FRAME and FRAME extension. In: Journal of bone and mineral research, 2024, vol. 39, n° 9, p. 1268–1277. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae116
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (1)
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0884-0431
75views
628downloads

Technical informations

Creation30/09/2024 10:12:39
First validation22/10/2024 06:29:53
Update30/10/2024 13:19:30
Status update30/10/2024 13:19:30
Last indexation30/10/2024 13:20:54
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack