en
Scientific article
Open access
English

Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer : European multicentre, propensity score-matched study

Published inBJS open, vol. 8, no. 3, zrae044
Publication date2024-05-08
Abstract

Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard surgery for low/mid locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare three minimally invasive surgical approaches for TME with primary anastomosis (laparoscopic TME, robotic TME, and transanal TME).

Methods: Records of patients undergoing laparoscopic TME, robotic TME, or transanal TME between 2013 and 2022 according to standardized techniques in expert centres contributing to the European MRI and Rectal Cancer Surgery III (EuMaRCS-III) database were analysed. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the three groups with respect to the complication rate (primary outcome), conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and survival.

Results: A total of 468 patients (mean(s.d.) age of 64.1(11) years) were included; 190 (40.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic TME, 141 (30.1%) patients underwent robotic TME, and 137 (29.3%) patients underwent transanal TME. Comparative analyses after propensity score matching demonstrated a higher rate of postoperative complications for laparoscopic TME compared with both robotic TME (OR 1.80, 95% c.i. 1.11-2.91) and transanal TME (OR 2.87, 95% c.i. 1.72-4.80). Robotic TME was associated with a lower rate of grade A anastomotic leakage (2%) compared with both laparoscopic TME (8.8%) and transanal TME (8.1%) (P = 0.031). Robotic TME (1.4%) and transanal TME (0.7%) were both associated with a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic TME (8.8%) (P < 0.001). Time to flatus and duration of hospital stay were shorter for patients treated with transanal TME (P = 0.003 and 0.001 respectively). There were no differences in operating time, intraoperative complications, blood loss, mortality, readmission, R0 resection, or survival.

Conclusion: In this multicentre, retrospective, propensity score-matched, cohort study of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, newer minimally invasive approaches (robotic TME and transanal TME) demonstrated improved outcomes compared with laparoscopic TME.

eng
Keywords
  • Humans
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Male
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Middle Aged
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
  • Propensity Score
  • Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Europe
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transanal Endoscopic Surgery / methods
  • Transanal Endoscopic Surgery / adverse effects
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Rectum / surgery
  • Proctectomy / methods
  • Proctectomy / adverse effects
Citation (ISO format)
DE’ANGELIS, Nicola et al. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer : European multicentre, propensity score-matched study. In: BJS open, 2024, vol. 8, n° 3, p. zrae044. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae044
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (1)
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal2474-9842
45views
7downloads

Technical informations

Creation06/03/2024 7:45:14 AM
First validation06/18/2024 12:34:52 PM
Update time06/18/2024 12:34:52 PM
Status update06/18/2024 12:34:52 PM
Last indexation06/18/2024 12:35:13 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack