Scientific article
OA Policy
English

A study is 21 times more likely to find unfavourable results about the nutrition label Nutri-Score if the authors declare a conflict of interest or the study is funded by the food industry

Published inBMJ global health, vol. 8, no. 5, e011720
Publication date2023-10-24
First online date2023-05-19
Abstract

  • Many scientists and health professionals consider that scientific evidence that supports front-of-pack nutrition labelling, such as ‘Nutri-Score’, becomes mandatory in Europe to help consumers make healthier choices at the point of purchase.
  • Politicians and political parties, food manufacturers and some agricultural sectors are opposed to nutrition labelling such as ‘Nutri-Score’ as they claim that scientific studies insufficiently support making it into a policy.
  • The findings of 83% of studies published in peer-reviewed journals support nutrition labelling such as ‘Nutri-Score’.
  • The probability for an article to show results that are not favourable to nutrition labelling such as ‘Nutri-Score’ is 21 times higher if the authors declare a conflict of interest or if the study is funded by the food industry.

Keywords
  • Nutrition
  • Prevention strategies
  • Public health
Citation (ISO format)
BESANCON, Stephane, BERAN, David Henri, BATAL, Malek. A study is 21 times more likely to find unfavourable results about the nutrition label Nutri-Score if the authors declare a conflict of interest or the study is funded by the food industry. In: BMJ global health, 2023, vol. 8, n° 5, p. e011720. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011720
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (2)
Identifiers
Journal ISSN2059-7908
75views
10downloads

Technical informations

Creation15/08/2023 09:53:03
First validation05/04/2024 13:35:31
Update time05/04/2024 13:35:31
Status update05/04/2024 13:35:31
Last indexation01/11/2024 10:08:09
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack