en
Scientific article
Meta-analysis
English

Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years : A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure

Published inThe American journal of sports medicine, vol. 52, no. 3, p. 822-831
Publication date2023-04-06
First online date2023-04-06
Abstract

Background: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial.

Purpose: This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established.

Results: The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%;P= .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%;P= .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%;P> .05).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of <10%. The failure mechanism and the time of failure is poorly documented; further studies are needed for a better understanding of the retear mechanism.

eng
Keywords
  • All-inside repair
  • Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • Inside-out repair
  • Meniscal repair
  • Meniscal suture
Citation (ISO format)
SCHWEIZER, Conradin et al. Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years : A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure. In: The American journal of sports medicine, 2023, vol. 52, n° 3, p. 822–831. doi: 10.1177/03635465231158385
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0363-5465
15views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation07/06/2023 9:39:11 AM
First validation03/25/2024 2:34:45 PM
Update time03/25/2024 2:34:45 PM
Status update03/25/2024 2:34:45 PM
Last indexation03/25/2024 2:35:05 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack