Scientific article

Virtus sermonis and the semantics-pragmatics distinction

Published inVivarium, vol. 49, no. 1-3, p. 214-239
Publication date2011


Late medieval theories of language and contemporary philosophy of language have been compared on numerous occasions. Here, we would like to compare two debates: that between the nature of Virtus sermonis , on the medieval side—focusing on a statute published in 1340 by the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris and its opponents—and, on the contemporary side, the on-going discussion on the semantics-pragmatics distinction and how the truth-value of an utterance should be established. Both the statute and Gricean pragmatics insist on the importance of taking into account the speaker’s intention and the context in establishing the signification of an utterance. Yet, upon closer examination, a more convincing parallel might be drawn between the statute’s position and current theories in truth-conditional pragmatics. Focusing on a few aspects of the statute that seem to find a counterpart within contemporary pragmatics, we try to show how the issues they give rise to converge, but also diverge.

Citation (ISO format)
GOUBIER, Frédéric, POUSCOULOUS, Nausicaa. <i>Virtus sermonis</i> and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In: Vivarium, 2011, vol. 49, n° 1-3, p. 214–239. doi: 10.1163/156853411X590507
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
ISSN of the journal0042-7543

Technical informations

Creation06/20/2023 1:56:00 PM
First validation06/27/2023 6:40:28 AM
Update time06/27/2023 6:40:28 AM
Status update06/27/2023 6:40:28 AM
Last indexation01/18/2024 12:15:00 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack