Scientific article
English

Permanent pacemaker implantation following valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: VIVID registry

Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 77, no. 18, p. 2263-2273
Publication date2021-05-11
Abstract

Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remains one of the main drawbacks of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but scarce data exist on PPI after valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR, particularly with the use of newer-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs).

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the incidence, factors associated with, and clinical impact of PPI in a large series of ViV-TAVR procedures.

Methods: Data were obtained from the multicenter VIVID Registry and included the main baseline and procedural characteristics, in-hospital and late (median follow-up: 13 months [interquartile range: 3 to 41 months]) outcomes analyzed according to the need of periprocedural PPI. All THVs except CoreValve, Cribier-Edwards, Sapien, and Sapien XT were considered to be new-generation THVs.

Results: A total of 1,987 patients without prior PPI undergoing ViV-TAVR from 2007 to 2020 were included. Of these, 128 patients (6.4%) had PPI after TAVR, with a significant decrease in the incidence of PPI with the use of new-generation THVs (4.7% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.017), mainly related to a reduced PPI rate with the Evolut R/Pro versus CoreValve (3.7% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in PPI rates between newer-generation balloon-and self-expanding THVs (6.1% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.18). In the multivariable analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05 for each increase of 1 year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.07; p = 0.001), larger THV size (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.20; p = 0.02), and previous right bundle branch block (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.17; p = 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of PPI. There were no differences in 30-day mortality between the PPI (4.7%) and no-PPI (2.7%) groups (p = 0.19), but PPI patients exhibited a trend toward higher mortality risk at follow-up (hazard ratio: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.91; p = 0.04; p = 0.08 after adjusting for age differences between groups).

Conclusions: In a contemporary large series of ViV-TAVR patients, the rate of periprocedural PPI was relatively low, and its incidence decreased with the use of new-generation THV systems. PPI following ViV-TAVR was associated with a trend toward increased mortality at follow-up.

Keywords
  • Pacemaker
  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  • Valve in valve
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Registries
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement / methods
Citation (ISO format)
ALPERI, Alberto et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation following valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: VIVID registry. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2021, vol. 77, n° 18, p. 2263–2273. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.228
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0735-1097
200views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation21/02/2022 15:37:00
First validation21/02/2022 15:37:00
Update16/03/2023 06:48:10
Status update16/03/2023 06:48:06
Last indexation01/11/2024 01:58:38
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack