Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Rapid Sequence Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium After Magnesium Pretreatment Compared With Succinylcholine: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Published inAnesthesia and analgesia, vol. 133, no. 6, p. 1540-1549
Publication date2021-12
First online date2020-12-17
Abstract

Background: Succinylcholine remains the muscle relaxant of choice for rapid sequence induction (RSI) but has many adverse effects. High-dose rocuronium bromide may be an alternative to succinylcholine for RSI but recovery times are nearly doubled compared with a standard intubating dose of rocuronium. Magnesium sulfate significantly shortens the onset time of a standard intubating dose of rocuronium. We set out to investigate whether intravenous (IV) pretreatment with MgSO4 followed by a standard intubating dose of rocuronium achieved superior intubation conditions compared with succinylcholine.

Methods: Adults were randomized to receive a 15-minute IV infusion of MgSO4 (60 mg·kg-1) immediately before RSI with propofol 2 mg·kg-1, sufentanil 0.2 μg·kg-1 and rocuronium 0.6 mg·kg-1, or a matching 15-minute IV infusion of saline immediately before an identical RSI, but with succinylcholine 1 mg·kg-1. Primary end point was the rate of excellent intubating conditions 60 seconds after administration of the neuromuscular blocking agent and compared between groups using multivariable log-binomial regression model. Secondary end points were blood pressure and heart rate before induction, before and after intubation, and adverse events up to 24 hours postoperatively.

Results: Among 280 randomized patients, intubating conditions could be analyzed in 259 (133 MgSO4-rocuronium and 126 saline-succinylcholine). The rate of excellent intubating conditions was 46% with MgSO4-rocuronium and 45% with saline-succinylcholine. The analysis adjusted for gender and center showed no superiority of MgSO4-rocuronium compared with saline-succinylcholine (relative risk [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.39, P = .659). The rate of excellent intubating conditions was higher in women (54% [70 of 130]) compared with men (37% [48 of 129]; adjusted RR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.07-1.91, P = .017). No significant difference between groups was observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Mean heart rate was significantly higher in the MgSO4-rocuronium group. The percentage of patients with at least 1 adverse event was lower with MgSO4-rocuronium (11%) compared with saline-succinylcholine (28%) (RR 0.38, 95% CI, 0.22-0.66, P < .001). With saline-succinylcholine, adverse events consisted mainly of postoperative muscle pain (n = 26 [19%]) and signs of histamine release (n = 13 [9%]). With MgSO4-rocuronium, few patients had pain on injection, nausea and vomiting, or skin rash during the MgSO4-infusion (n = 5 [4%]).

Conclusions: IV pretreatment with MgSO4 followed by a standard intubating dose of rocuronium did not provide superior intubation conditions to succinylcholine but had fewer adverse effects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01571908.

Keywords
  • Adult
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Heart Rate / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / methods
  • Magnesium Sulfate / administration & dosage
  • Magnesium Sulfate / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents / adverse effects
  • Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents / adverse effects
  • Pain, Postoperative / epidemiology
  • Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation / methods
  • Rocuronium / adverse effects
  • Sex Characteristics
  • Succinylcholine / adverse effects
  • Young Adult
  • Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents
  • Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents
  • Magnesium Sulfate
  • Succinylcholine
  • Rocuronium
Citation (ISO format)
CZARNETZKI, Christoph et al. Rapid Sequence Induction With a Standard Intubation Dose of Rocuronium After Magnesium Pretreatment Compared With Succinylcholine: A Randomized Clinical Trial. In: Anesthesia and analgesia, 2021, vol. 133, n° 6, p. 1540–1549. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005324
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (2)
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0003-2999
465views
78downloads

Technical informations

Creation07/03/2022 14:02:00
First validation07/03/2022 14:02:00
Update time16/03/2023 06:47:27
Status update16/03/2023 06:47:25
Last indexation01/11/2024 01:57:56
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack