Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study
ContributorsUeki, Yasushi; Yamaji, Kyohei; Losdat, Sylvain; Karagiannis, Alexios; Taniwaki, Masanori; Roffi, Marco; Otsuka, Tatsuhiko; Koskinas, Konstantinos C; Holmvang, Lene; Maldonado, Rafaela; Pedrazzini, Giovanni; Radu, Maria D; Dijkstra, Jouke; Windecker, Stephan; Garcia-Garcia, Hector M; Räber, Lorenz
Published inThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging, vol. 37, no. 10, p. 2839-2847
Publication date2021-10
First online date2021-07-08
Abstract
Keywords
- Fibroatheroma
- Intravascular ultrasound
- Optical coherence tomography
- Radiofrequency
- Coronary Artery Disease / diagnostic imaging
- Coronary Artery Disease / therapy
- Coronary Vessels / diagnostic imaging
- Humans
- Myocardial Infarction
- Plaque, Atherosclerotic
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Tomography, Optical Coherence
- Ultrasonography, Interventional
Affiliation entities
Funding
Citation (ISO format)
UEKI, Yasushi et al. Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study. In: The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021, vol. 37, n° 10, p. 2839–2847. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (1)
Identifiers
- PID : unige:161060
- DOI : 10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6
- PMID : 34236570
- PMCID : PMC8494667
ISSN of the journal1569-5794