Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study

Published inThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging, vol. 37, no. 10, p. 2839-2847
Publication date2021-10
First online date2021-07-08
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between radiofrequency (RF) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) in non-infarct-related coronary arteries (non-IRA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In the Integrated Biomarker Imaging Study (IBIS-4), 103 STEMI patients underwent OCT and RF-IVUS imaging of non-IRA after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention and at 13-month follow-up. A coronary lesion was defined as a segment with ≥ 3 consecutive frames (≈1.2 mm) with plaque burden ≥ 40% as assessed by grayscale IVUS. RF-IVUS-derived TCFA was defined as a lesion with > 10% confluent necrotic core abutting to the lumen in > 10% of the circumference. OCT-TCFA was defined by a minimum cap thickness < 65 μm. The two modalities were matched based on anatomical landmarks using a dedicated matching software. Using grayscale IVUS, we identified 276 lesions at baseline (N = 146) and follow-up (N = 130). Using RF-IVUS, 208 lesions (75.4%) were classified as TCFA. Among them, OCT identified 14 (6.7%) TCFA, 60 (28.8%) thick-cap fibroatheroma (ThCFA), and 134 (64.4%) non-fibroatheroma. All OCT-TCFA (n = 14) were confirmed as RF-TCFA. The concordance rate between RF-IVUS and OCT for TCFA diagnosis was 29.7%. The reasons for discordance were: OCT-ThCFA (25.8%); OCT-fibrous plaque (34.0%); attenuation due to calcium (23.2%); attenuation due to macrophage (10.3%); no significant attenuation (6.7%). There was a notable discordance in the diagnostic assessment of TCFA between RF-IVUS and OCT. The majority of RF-derived TCFA were not categorized as fibroatheroma using OCT, while all OCT-TCFA were classified as TCFA by RF-IVUS.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00962416.

Keywords
  • Fibroatheroma
  • Intravascular ultrasound
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Radiofrequency
  • Coronary Artery Disease / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy
  • Coronary Vessels / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Plaque, Atherosclerotic
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
Citation (ISO format)
UEKI, Yasushi et al. Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study. In: The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021, vol. 37, n° 10, p. 2839–2847. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (1)
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal1569-5794
121views
59downloads

Technical informations

Creation21/02/2022 15:36:00
First validation21/02/2022 15:36:00
Update time24/07/2024 07:09:01
Status update24/07/2024 07:09:01
Last indexation01/10/2024 21:29:08
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack