The (geno)toxicity of sediment dichloromethane extracts and fractions obtained by size exclusion chromatography were evaluated to investigate effects based on size fractionation. In this study, three sediments were selected according to their incremental contamination in PAHs and in PCBs: Hamilton harbour, Toronto bay and lake St. Clair sediments. Heavy metals, total sulfur and elemental sulfur (S₈) were also determined in the (un)fractionated sediment extracts. The liver cells were exposed to concentrations of sediment extracts and fractionated samples for 24 h at 15°C, afterwhich cell viability, cytochrome P450IA1 activity, available free Zn, DNA damage and oxidative stress were determined. The results showed that the sediment extracts contained high levels of sulfur most of which was found in the low molecular weight (LMW) region, i.e., the 2000-50 atomic mass unit (amu) fraction. Elemental sulfur (S₈) accounted for 14–41 % of extractable sulfur and were found to elute in the post-column volume (PCV) fraction despite its molecular weight of 256 amu. Heavy metals were found mainly in the HMW (i.e the >2000 amu) fraction and LMW fractions and very few or none were observed in the PCV fractions. In sediment extracts, sublethal effects were present principally by the HMW and LMW fractions suggesting that some chemicals were also associated with high molecular weight compounds of extractable organic matter. Less toxicity or effect was sometimes found in the extract indicating an antagonistic effect of the contaminants. We found that cell viability and genotoxicity evaluations could be performed on the unfractionated extracts while EROD, available Zn and oxidative stress measurements should be performed on the LMW fractions because of possible antagonist or shielding effects. Considering the cytotoxic responses, the best toxicity ranking in respect to contaminant levels in sediment extract was obtained with the LMW and PCV fractions which accounted for most of the toxic responses in the chromatographic fractions. Moreover, the shielding effect could be explained, in part, by the association of LMW contaminants to large macromolecules.