Working paper
Open access

Taxing the 1 percent: Public opinion vs. public policy

Number of pages46
First online date2021-12-03

A growing body of research suggests that public policy in formal democracies mostly caters to the interests of the rich and ignores the average citizen whenever the two want different things from government. I argue that the modern income tax system has become a clear illustration of this, and I test the proposition on a least likely case: Norway. I asked Norwegians to design their preferred tax structure by setting tax rates for a group of imaginary taxpayers with annual incomes ranging from low to extremely high. Their answers were matched with registry data on what the same kinds of taxpayers actually paid in income tax in 2018. I find that for approximately 99% of the income distribution (the bottom 99%), the current tax system matches closely with public opinion. However, for incomes in the top 1 percent, tax rates are far below (as much as 23 percentage points) from where ordinary citizens, and in fact the modestly affluent, want them to be. I further examine two potential underlying causes of this discrepancy: The gradual reduction of the top marginal income tax rate since the 1960's, and the preferential taxation of capital incomes, comparing both with public opinion data. My results suggest that even in a fairly egalitarian society like Norway, the rich get away with paying considerably less in tax than what people deem to be fair.

  • European Commission - Unequal Democracies [741538]
Citation (ISO format)
MATHISEN, Ruber Berge. Taxing the 1 percent: Public opinion vs. public policy. 2021
Main files (1)
Working paper
  • PID : unige:156942

Technical informations

Creation12/03/2021 2:43:00 PM
First validation12/03/2021 2:43:00 PM
Update time03/16/2023 2:00:19 AM
Status update03/16/2023 2:00:18 AM
Last indexation10/19/2023 4:56:10 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack