en
Scientific article
Open access
English

Why the Standard TFR gives a Misleading Impression of the Fertility of Foreign Women: Insights from Switzerland

Published inComparative Population Studies, vol. 45, p. 417-444
Publication date2020
Abstract

Since 1971 the Swiss Federal Statistical Offi ce has published annual fertility data split by nationality (Swiss/foreign). These indicate that the TFR for women of foreign nationality has been 0.5 children higher than for Swiss women for most of the period since 1991. However, statistics from household registration (STATPOP) and the Families and Generations Surveys (FGS) in 2013 and 2018 indicate that foreign women, approaching the end of their reproductive lives, have slightly smaller families than women of Swiss nationality. The purpose of this paper is to reconcile these contradictory fertility measures. To do this, we design a novel methodology for tallying the fertility of cohorts of Swiss and foreign nationals through their reproductive life. In addition to birth registrations and population totals by age (the input data for calculating the TFR) we also include estimates of how many children women have at the time of their immigration, emigration and naturalisation. Using these input data, we compile the fertility profi les of Swiss and foreign women aged 15-49 (cohorts 1966-2003). These correspond well with the FGS and household register data. Several processes impact the fi nal fertility of the two sub-populations. Women frequently immigrate into Switzerland in their 20s. Often arriving childless, they commonly start childbearing soon after immigration. However, there is still a fl ow of low-fertility women into the country in their 30s and 40s, lowering the average fertility of the foreign population. By contrast, Swiss women start childbearing later and a signifi cant proportion remain childless; however, after starting childbearing they have a higher propensity than foreign women to have a second and third child. Naturalisation and fertility are interlinked; women with children are more likely to naturalise than those without, which then boosts the average fertility of the Swiss population. We confi rm that the standard TFR gives an infl ated impression of the ultimate (cohort) fertility of foreign nationals and under-estimates that of Swiss women, and we describe how this happens. Fundamentally, the TFR is a measure of childbearing intensity, not an accurate estimate of completed cohort fertility, especially for a mobile population

Keywords
  • Immigrant fertility
  • Fertility of foreigners
  • TFR
  • Cohort fertility
  • Immigration
  • Timing of childbearing
  • Naturalisation
  • Postponement
Citation (ISO format)
BURKIMSHER, Marion, ROSSIER, Clementine, WANNER, Philippe. Why the Standard TFR gives a Misleading Impression of the Fertility of Foreign Women: Insights from Switzerland. In: Comparative Population Studies, 2020, vol. 45, p. 417–444. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2020-23
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal1869-8999
188views
113downloads

Technical informations

Creation08/31/2021 12:05:00 PM
First validation08/31/2021 12:05:00 PM
Update time03/16/2023 1:12:32 AM
Status update03/16/2023 1:12:31 AM
Last indexation01/17/2024 2:07:21 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack