Scientific article
Open access

Analytic metaphysics versus naturalized metaphysics : the relevance of applied ontology

Published inErkenntnis, vol. 86, no. 1, p. 21-37
Publication date2021

The relevance of analytic metaphysics has come under criticism: Ladyman & Ross, for instance, have suggested do discontinue the field. French & McKenzie have argued in defense of analytic metaphysics that it develops tools that could turn out to be useful for philosophy of physics. In this article, we show first that this heuristic defense of metaphysics can be extended to the scientific field of applied ontology, which uses constructs from analytic metaphysics. Second, we elaborate on a parallel by French & McKenzie between mathematics and metaphysics to show that the whole field of analytic metaphysics, being useful not only for philosophy but also for science, should continue to exist as a largely autonomous field.

  • Metaphysics
  • Ontology
  • Physics
  • Applied ontology
  • Philosophical methodology
  • Quantum gravity
  • A priori
  • Naturalised
Citation (ISO format)
LE BIHAN, Baptiste, BARTON, Adrien. Analytic metaphysics versus naturalized metaphysics : the relevance of applied ontology. In: Erkenntnis, 2021, vol. 86, n° 1, p. 21–37. doi: 10.1007/s10670-018-0091-8
Main files (1)
Article (Accepted version)
ISSN of the journal0165-0106

Technical informations

Creation06/02/2021 5:40:00 PM
First validation06/02/2021 5:40:00 PM
Update time03/16/2023 12:42:29 AM
Status update03/16/2023 12:42:29 AM
Last indexation05/06/2024 7:41:26 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack