fr
Article scientifique
Revue de la littérature
Accès libre
Anglais

Impact of double-blind vs. open study design on the observed treatment effects of new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Publié dansJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1240-1250
Date de publication2013
Résumé

Background: The prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) design has been proposed as a valid alternative to the double-blind (DB) design for trials comparing new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) with INR-adjusted vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Objectives: To determine whether the observed treatment effects of NOAs in patients with NVAF differ between PROBE/open-label trials and DB trials.

Mots-clés
  • Anticoagulants
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Bias
  • Meta-analysis
  • Stroke
Structure d'affiliation Pas une publication de l'UNIGE
Citation (format ISO)
LEGA, J.-C. et al. Impact of double-blind vs. open study design on the observed treatment effects of new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. In: Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2013, vol. 11, n° 7, p. 1240–1250. doi: 10.1111/jth.12294
Fichiers principaux (1)
Article (Published version)
Identifiants
ISSN du journal1538-7836
110vues
71téléchargements

Informations techniques

Création02.04.2021 17:03:00
Première validation02.04.2021 17:03:00
Heure de mise à jour16.03.2023 00:28:12
Changement de statut16.03.2023 00:28:11
Dernière indexation12.02.2024 13:25:46
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack