UNIGE document Book Chapter
previous document  unige:14924  next document
add to browser collection

Mediating Evil: The Editorial and Critical Reception of Shakespeare's Villains

Published in Stirling, Kirsten & Hennard Dutheil de la Rochère, Martine. After Satan: Essays in Honour of Neil Forsyth. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press. 2010, p. 68-84
Abstract Although Samuel Johnson considered footnotes ‘necessary evils' and warned that the mind would be ‘refrigerated by interruption', annotation has always been key in bridging the historical and cultural divide separating Shakespeare's late-sixteenth or early-seventeenth-century plays from their readers in later centuries. In this article I explore how editors from the eighteenth to the early twenty-first century have annotated and, more generally, editorially mediated instances of seemingly gratuitous evil, such as the machinations of Iago in Othello and Edmund in King Lear. While editors in the eighteenth century are primarily concerned with semantic understanding, nineteenth-century editors seem more inclined to mediate to readers a certain emotional and moral understanding, inculcating what they perceived to be socially appropriate responses. More recent editors, by contrast, attempt to convey a fuller historical and philosophical understanding of the ‘evil' at work in the play. The editorial practices which this article proposes to trace allow insights not only into changing attitudes to fictional evil but also into what the function of literature (and of Shakespeare in particular) was (and is) supposed to be.
Keywords EvilWilliam ShakespeareEditingOthelloKing Lear
Stable URL https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:14924
Full text
Book chapter (2.4 MB) - public document Free access
ISBN: 978-1-4438-2338-8

369 hits



Deposited on : 2011-04-06

Export document
Format :
Citation style :