en
Scientific article
Open access
English

Comparison of pleural and esophageal pressure in supine and prone positions in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Published inJournal of Applied Physiology, vol. 128, no. 6, p. 1617-1625
Publication date2020
Abstract

Patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) benefit from prone positioning. Although the accuracy of esophageal pressure (Pes) to estimate regional pleural pressure (Ppl) has previously been assessed in the supine position, such data are not available in the prone position in ARDS. In six anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated female pigs, we measured Pes and Ppl into dorsal and ventral parts of the right pleural cavity. Airway pressure (Paw) and flow were measured at the airway opening. Severe ARDS [arterial partial pressure of oxygen ([Formula: see text])/fraction of inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]) < 100 mmHg at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O] was induced by surfactant depletion. In supine and prone positions assigned in a random order, PEEP was set to 20, 15, 10, and 5 cmH2O and static end-expiratory chest wall pressures were measured from Pes (PEEPtot,es) and dorsal (PEEPtot,PplD) and ventral (PEEPtot,PplV) Ppl. The magnitude of the difference between PEEPtot,es and PEEPtot,PplD was similar in each position [-3.6 cmH2O in supine vs. -3.8 cmH2O in prone at PEEP 20 cmH2O (PEEP 20)]. The difference between PEEPtot,es and PEEPtot,PplV became narrower in the prone position (-8.3 cmH2O supine vs. -3.0 cmH2O prone at PEEP 20). PEEPtot,PplV was overestimated by Pes in the prone position at higher pressures. The median (1st-3rd quartiles) dorsal-to-ventral Ppl gradient was 4.4 (2.4-6.8) cmH2O in the supine position and -1.5 (-3.5 to +1.1) cmH2O in the prone position (P < 0.0001) and marginally influenced by PEEP (P = 0.058). Prone position narrowed end-expiratory dorsal-to-ventral Ppl vertical gradient, likely because of a more even distribution of mechanical forces over the chest wall.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome, we found that static end-expiratory esophageal pressure did not change significantly in prone position compared with supine position at any positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) tested between 5 and 20 cmH2O. Prone position was associated with an increased ventral pleural pressure and reduced end-expiratory dorsal-to-ventral pleural pressure (Ppl) vertical gradient, likely due to a more even distribution of mechanical forces over the chest wall.

Keywords
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Esophageal pressure
  • Pleural pressure
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure
  • Prone position
  • Transpulmonary pressure
Funding
  • Autre - This work is supported by the French National Research Agency in the framework of the “Investissements d'avenir” program (ANR-15-IDEX-02).
Citation (ISO format)
TERZI, N et al. Comparison of pleural and esophageal pressure in supine and prone positions in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. In: Journal of Applied Physiology, 2020, vol. 128, n° 6, p. 1617–1625. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00251.2020
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal8750-7587
170views
60downloads

Technical informations

Creation10/23/2020 2:44:00 PM
First validation10/23/2020 2:44:00 PM
Update time03/16/2023 12:03:26 AM
Status update03/16/2023 12:03:25 AM
Last indexation01/17/2024 12:26:46 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack