Scientific article
English

Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II)

Published inAmerican Heart Journal, vol. 209, p. 1-8
Publication date2019
Abstract

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in most heart failure patients, up to 40% do not respond to CRT. Data from the MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) IDE trial and MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE I study suggest improved response in subjects in the MPP arm-programmed with wide left ventricular (LV) electrode anatomical separation (≥30 mm) and shortest timing delays of 5 milliseconds (MPP-AS)-compared with quadripolar biventricular (BiV) pacing.

Keywords
  • Aged
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Failure/physiopathology/therapy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume/physiology
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Function
  • Left/physiology
  • Ventricular Remodeling
Citation (ISO format)
LECLERCQ, Christophe et al. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II). In: American Heart Journal, 2019, vol. 209, p. 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0002-8703
172views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation12/10/2020 14:53:00
First validation12/10/2020 14:53:00
Update time15/03/2023 23:37:04
Status update15/03/2023 23:37:03
Last indexation31/10/2024 20:38:20
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack