

![]() |
Clinical and esthetic outcomes of two different prosthetic workflows for implant-supported all-ceramic single crowns-3 year results of a randomized multicenter clinical trail |
|
Authors | ||
Published in | Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2020, vol. 31, no. 5, p. 495-505 | |
Abstract | The aim of this randomized multicenter clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the performance of anterior all-ceramic implant crowns based either on prefabricated zirconia abutments veneered with pressed ceramics or on CAD/CAM zirconia abutments veneered with the hand build-up technique. The null hypothesis was that there is no statistically significant difference between the two study groups. | |
Keywords | Ceramics — Crowns — Dental Abutments — Dental Implants — Dental Prosthesis — Implant-Supported — Dental Restoration Failure — Esthetics — Dental — Humans — Switzerland — Workflow — Zirconium | |
Identifiers | DOI: 10.1111/clr.13586 PMID: 32012346 | |
Full text | ||
Structures | ||
Research group | Groupe Sailer Iréna (946) | |
Citation (ISO format) | WITTNEBEN, Julia-Gabriela et al. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of two different prosthetic workflows for implant-supported all-ceramic single crowns-3 year results of a randomized multicenter clinical trail. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2020, vol. 31, n° 5, p. 495-505. doi: 10.1111/clr.13586 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:144065 |