







Other version: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/1/e024315
![]() |
Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis |
|
Authors | ![]() | |
Published in | BMJ open. 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, e024315 | |
Abstract | OBJECTIVES: We systematically analysed recommendations from gout guidelines as an example, to provide a basis for developing a reporting standard of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). DESIGN: Systematic review without meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE and all relevant guideline websites (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, WHO, Guidelines International Network, DynaMed, UpTodate, Best Practice) from their inception to January 2017 to identify and select gout CPGs. We used search terms such as 'gout', 'hyperuricemia' and 'guideline'. We included the eligible CPGs of gout according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria after screening titles, abstracts and full texts. The characteristics of recommendations reported in the included guidelines were extracted and analysed. | |
Keywords | RIGHT — Checklist — Clinical practice guidelines — Gout — Recommendation | |
Identifiers | PMID: 30700479 | |
Full text |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Other version: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/1/e024315 |
|
Structures | ||
Research group | Maladies infectieuses et modèles mathématiques (988) | |
Project | Swiss National Science Foundation: 163878 | |
Citation (ISO format) | YANG, Nan et al. Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis. In: BMJ Open, 2019, vol. 9, n° 1, p. e024315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024315 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:125271 |