en
Scientific article
Review
Open access
English

Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis

Published inBMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 1, e024315
Publication date2019
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We systematically analysed recommendations from gout guidelines as an example, to provide a basis for developing a reporting standard of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). DESIGN: Systematic review without meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE and all relevant guideline websites (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, WHO, Guidelines International Network, DynaMed, UpTodate, Best Practice) from their inception to January 2017 to identify and select gout CPGs. We used search terms such as 'gout', 'hyperuricemia' and 'guideline'. We included the eligible CPGs of gout according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria after screening titles, abstracts and full texts. The characteristics of recommendations reported in the included guidelines were extracted and analysed.

Keywords
  • RIGHT
  • Checklist
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Gout
  • Recommendation
Funding
  • Swiss National Science Foundation - 163878
Citation (ISO format)
YANG, Nan et al. Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis. In: BMJ Open, 2019, vol. 9, n° 1, p. e024315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024315
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (3)
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal2044-6055
290views
147downloads

Technical informations

Creation06/11/2019 11:49:00 AM
First validation06/11/2019 11:49:00 AM
Update time03/15/2023 6:16:32 PM
Status update03/15/2023 6:16:29 PM
Last indexation02/12/2024 1:06:26 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack