Scientific article

Sophisms to Sustain Disulfirams Efficacy

Publication date2016

Despite the absence of adequate scientific evidence, disulfiram has been prescribed for decades and is still largely advocated. As the arguments sustaining its use cannot be evidence based, they have to be founded on other properties in order to be effective. The present paper reviews different forms of fallacies used to sustain disulfiram's efficacy. We formulate the hypothesis that the frequency of consented use of fallacious arguments (or even sophisms) within an otherwise supposedly evidence based discipline may be indicative of (a) a scientifically immature discipline, and/or (b) a moralistically intermingled discipline. Inversely, the progressive decrease of sophisms should then be suggestive of scientific maturation.

  • Disulfiram
  • Alcohol use disorder
  • Scientific method
  • Efficacy
  • Pharmacotherapy
Citation (ISO format)
ZULLINO, Daniele Fabio et al. Sophisms to Sustain Disulfirams Efficacy. In: Journal of Addictive Behaviors, Therapy & Rehabilitation, 2016, vol. 05, n° 04. doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000157
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
ISSN of the journal2324-9005

Technical informations

Creation12/19/2018 2:17:00 PM
First validation12/19/2018 2:17:00 PM
Update time03/15/2023 3:19:26 PM
Status update03/15/2023 3:19:24 PM
Last indexation01/17/2024 4:36:33 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack