Scientific article
English

Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method

Published inInternational Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 127, no. 5, p. 981-989
Publication date2013
Abstract

Postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) was introduced into forensic investigations a few years ago. It provides reliable images that can be consulted at any time. Conventional autopsy remains the reference standard for defining the cause of death, but provides only limited possibility of a second examination. This study compares these two procedures and discusses findings that can be detected exclusively using each method.

Keywords
  • Adipose Tissue/pathology
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiography
  • Autopsy
  • Blood Vessels/pathology
  • Bone and Bones/pathology
  • Cause of Death
  • Contrast Media
  • Female
  • Forensic Pathology/methods
  • Fractures, Bone/pathology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult
Citation (ISO format)
CHEVALLIER, Christine et al. Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method. In: International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2013, vol. 127, n° 5, p. 981–989. doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0814-3
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0937-9827
430views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation18/09/2018 09:09:00
First validation18/09/2018 09:09:00
Update15/03/2023 15:12:30
Status update15/03/2023 15:12:29
Last indexation31/10/2024 12:10:26
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack