Scientific Article
previous document  unige:107295  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Frankfurt-Style Cases and the Explanation Condition for Moral Responsibility: a Reply to Swenson

Author
Published in Acta Analytica. 2017, vol. 32, no. 4, p. 427-446
Abstract Frankfurt-style cases (FSCs) are supposed to constitute counter-examples to the principle of alternate possibilities, for they are cases in which we have the intuition that an agent is morally responsible for his action, even though he could not have done otherwise. In a recent paper, Swenson (2015) rejects this conclusion, on the basis of a comparison between standard FSCs, which typically feature actions, and similar cases involving omissions. Because the absence of alternate possibilities seems to preclude moral responsibility in the cases of omissions, and because there is no morally relevant difference between the cases of actions and omissions, Swenson concludes that agents are not morally responsible in standard FSCs. In the present paper, I argue that Swenson’s argument fails because there are at least two very important differences between both types of cases. First, there is a difference about whether agents in such cases actually perform the relevant action: while agents actually perform the relevant action in standard FSCs, they do not in FSCs supposedly involving omissions, for omissions require the possibility to have done otherwise. Second, while the agent’s behavior in standard FSCs actually explain that he performed the relevant action, the agent’s behavior in FSCs including omission actually fails to explain why the agent did not perform the relevant action. Beyond Swenson’s argument, I end up discussing what factors ultimately explain (and justify) our intuitions about FSCs involving omissions.
Keywords Alternate possibilitiesFrankfurt casesMoral responsibilityOmissions
Identifiers
Full text
Article (Published version) (463 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Other version: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12136-017-0316-5
Research group Thumos
Citation
(ISO format)
COVA, Florian. Frankfurt-Style Cases and the Explanation Condition for Moral Responsibility: a Reply to Swenson. In: Acta Analytica, 2017, vol. 32, n° 4, p. 427-446. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:107295

42 hits

1 download

Update

Deposited on : 2018-08-31

Export document
Format :
Citation style :