Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography

Published inAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 149, no. 4, p. 533-542
Publication date2016
Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the differences between 2 regions of maxillary voxel-based registration and to test the reproducibility of the registration.

Keywords
  • Adolescent
  • Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging
  • Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging
  • Anatomy, Cross-Sectional/statistics & numerical data
  • Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data
  • Child
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/statistics & numerical data
  • Cuspid/diagnostic imaging
  • Fiducial Markers
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional/statistics & numerical data
  • Maxilla/diagnostic imaging
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Molar/diagnostic imaging
  • Observer Variation
  • Orbit/diagnostic imaging
  • Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
  • Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation
  • Palate/diagnostic imaging
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Zygoma/diagnostic imaging
Citation (ISO format)
RUELLAS, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2016, vol. 149, n° 4, p. 533–542. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.026
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0889-5406
566views
352downloads

Technical informations

Creation23/03/2018 17:06:00
First validation23/03/2018 17:06:00
Update time15/03/2023 08:11:57
Status update15/03/2023 08:11:57
Last indexation03/10/2024 00:01:26
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack