Scientific Article
previous document  unige:101521  next document
add to browser collection

Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis

Schaefer, Stephan C.
Schmidt, Marcus
Mast, Fred
Lehr, Hans-Anton
Published in Virchows Archiv. 2012, vol. 461, no. 4, p. 399-403
Abstract We recently reported that nuclear grading in prostate cancer is subject to a strong confirmation bias induced by the tumor architecture. We now wondered whether a similar bias governs nuclear grading in breast carcinoma. An unannounced test was performed at a pathology conference. Pathologists were asked to grade nuclei in a PowerPoint presentation. Circular high power fields of 27 invasive ductal carcinomas were shown, superimposed over low power background images of either tubule-rich or tubule-poor carcinomas. We found (a) that diagnostic reproducibility of nuclear grades was poor to moderate (weighed kappa values between 0.07 and 0.54, 27 cases, 44 graders), but (b) that nuclear grades were not affected by the tumor architecture. We speculate that the categorized grading in breast cancer, separating tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic figure counts in a combined three tier score, prevents the bias that architecture exerts on nuclear grades in less well-controlled situations.
Keywords Confirmation biasCancer gradingNuclear pleomorphismArchitectureCognitive psychology
Full text
Article (Published version) (781 Kb) - public document Free access
Research group Affective sciences
(ISO format)
MORA, Braulio Daniel et al. Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis. In: Virchows Archiv, 2012, vol. 461, n° 4, p. 399-403. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1304-1

342 hits



Deposited on : 2018-01-22

Export document
Format :
Citation style :