Scientific article
Open access

Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis

Published inVirchows Archiv, vol. 461, no. 4, p. 399-403
Publication date2012

We recently reported that nuclear grading in prostate cancer is subject to a strong confirmation bias induced by the tumor architecture. We now wondered whether a similar bias governs nuclear grading in breast carcinoma. An unannounced test was performed at a pathology conference. Pathologists were asked to grade nuclei in a PowerPoint presentation. Circular high power fields of 27 invasive ductal carcinomas were shown, superimposed over low power background images of either tubule-rich or tubule-poor carcinomas. We found (a) that diagnostic reproducibility of nuclear grades was poor to moderate (weighed kappa values between 0.07 and 0.54, 27 cases, 44 graders), but (b) that nuclear grades were not affected by the tumor architecture. We speculate that the categorized grading in breast cancer, separating tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic figure counts in a combined three tier score, prevents the bias that architecture exerts on nuclear grades in less well-controlled situations.

  • Confirmation bias
  • Cancer grading
  • Nuclear pleomorphism
  • Architecture
  • Cognitive psychology
Affiliation Not a UNIGE publication
Research group
Citation (ISO format)
MORA, Braulio Daniel et al. Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis. In: Virchows Archiv, 2012, vol. 461, n° 4, p. 399–403. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1304-1
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
ISSN of the journal0945-6317

Technical informations

Creation11/21/2017 10:27:00 AM
First validation11/21/2017 10:27:00 AM
Update time03/15/2023 7:46:26 AM
Status update03/15/2023 7:46:25 AM
Last indexation01/17/2024 2:05:37 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack