Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke

Guggisberg, Adrian; Nicolo, Pierre; Cohen, Leonardo G; Schnider, Armin; Buch, Ethan R

doi:10.1177/1545968317740634

Scientific article

English

Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke

ContributorsGuggisberg, Adrian

; Nicolo, Pierre; Cohen, Leonardo G; Schnider, Armin; Buch, Ethan R

Published inNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 31, no. 12, p. 1029-1041

Publication date2017

Abstract

Evolution of motor function during the first months after stroke is stereotypically bifurcated, consisting of either recovery to about 70% of maximum possible improvement ("proportional recovery, PROP") or in little to no improvement ("poor recovery, POOR"). There is currently no evidence that any rehabilitation treatment will prevent POOR and favor PROP.

Affiliation entities

Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département des neurosciences cliniques

Research groups

Citation (ISO format)

GUGGISBERG, Adrian et al. Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2017, vol. 31, n° 12, p. 1029–1041. doi: 10.1177/1545968317740634

Article (Published version)

Article (Accepted version)

Identifiers

PID : unige:100651
DOI : 10.1177/1545968317740634
PMID : 29130824

Journal ISSN1545-9683

559views

185downloads

Creation11/23/2017 3:32:00 PM

First validation11/23/2017 3:32:00 PM

Update time03/15/2023 7:40:04 AM

Status update03/15/2023 7:40:03 AM

Last indexation10/31/2024 9:10:30 AM

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke

Technical informations