Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke

Guggisberg, Adrian; Nicolo, Pierre; Cohen, Leonardo G; Schnider, Armin; Buch, Ethan R

doi:10.1177/1545968317740634

Scientific article

English

Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke

ContributorsGuggisberg, Adrian

; Nicolo, Pierre; Cohen, Leonardo G; Schnider, Armin; Buch, Ethan R

Published inNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 31, no. 12, p. 1029-1041

Publication date2017

Abstract

Evolution of motor function during the first months after stroke is stereotypically bifurcated, consisting of either recovery to about 70% of maximum possible improvement ("proportional recovery, PROP") or in little to no improvement ("poor recovery, POOR"). There is currently no evidence that any rehabilitation treatment will prevent POOR and favor PROP.

Affiliation entities

Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département des neurosciences cliniques

Research groups

Citation (ISO format)

GUGGISBERG, Adrian et al. Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2017, vol. 31, n° 12, p. 1029–1041. doi: 10.1177/1545968317740634

Article (Published version)

Article (Accepted version)

Identifiers

PID : unige:100651
DOI : 10.1177/1545968317740634
PMID : 29130824

Journal ISSN1545-9683

563views

229downloads

Creation23/11/2017 15:32:00

First validation23/11/2017 15:32:00

Update15/03/2023 07:40:04

Status update15/03/2023 07:40:03

Last indexation31/10/2024 09:10:30

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke

Technical informations