Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Why we should talk about option generation in decision-making research

Published inFrontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, 555
Publication date2013
Abstract

Most empirical studies on decision-making start from a set of given options for action. However, in everyday life there is usually no one asking you to choose between A, B, and C. Recently, the question how people come up with options has been receiving growing attention. However, so far there has been neither a systematic attempt to define the construct of "option" nor an attempt to show why decision-making research really needs this construct. This paper aims to fill that void by developing definitions of "option" and "option generation" that can be used as a basis for decision-making research in a wide variety of decision-making settings, while clarifying how these notions relate to familiar psychological constructs. We conclude our analysis by arguing that there are indeed reasons to believe that option generation is an important and distinct aspect of human decision-making.

Affiliation entities Not a UNIGE publication
Citation (ISO format)
KALIS, Annemarie, KAISER, Stefan, MOJZISCH, Andreas. Why we should talk about option generation in decision-making research. In: Frontiers in Psychology, 2013, vol. 4, p. 555. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00555
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Identifiers
Journal ISSN1664-1078
420views
255downloads

Technical informations

Creation07/11/2017 15:53:00
First validation07/11/2017 15:53:00
Update13/10/2025 19:26:59
Status update15/03/2023 07:39:17
Last indexation11/02/2026 10:51:56
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack