Scientific Article
previous document  unige:100083  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats

Authors
Ryan, Michelle K.
Haslam, S. Alexander
Published in Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2010, vol. 34, no. 1, p. 56-64
Abstract Recent archival and experimental research has revealed that women are more likely than men to be appointed to leadership positions when an organization is in crisis. As a result, women often confront a “glass cliff” in which their position as leader is precarious. Our first archival study examined the 2005 UK general election and found that, in the Conservative party, women contested harder to win seats than did men. Our second study experimentally investigated the selection of a candidate by 80 undergraduates in a British political science class to contest a by-election in a seat that was either safe (held by own party with a large margin) or risky (held by an opposition party with a large margin). Results indicated that a male candidate was more likely than a woman to be selected to contest a safe seat, but there was a strong preference for a female rather than a male appointment when the seat was described as hard to win. Implications for women’s participation in politics are discussed.
Identifiers
Full text
Project RES-062-23-0135
Citation
(ISO format)
RYAN, Michelle K., HASLAM, S. Alexander, KULICH, Clara. Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats. In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2010, vol. 34, n° 1, p. 56-64. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:100083

61 hits

0 download

Update

Deposited on : 2017-12-08

Export document
Format :
Citation style :