The eRDS v6 Stereotest and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test: Two New Tests of Stereoscopic Vision

Article Article scientifique Article The eRDS v6 Stereotest and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test: Two New Tests of Stereoscopic Vision eng 2023-03-01 2023 author Denkinger Sylvie Chantal 0000-0002-8649-3461 Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland 834706 Section de psychologie (PSICO) author Antoniou Maria-Paraskevi Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland 917331 author Tarello Demetrio Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland 930072 author Levi Dennis M. Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA author Backus Benjamin T. Vivid Vision, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA author Bavelier Daphné 0000-0002-5904-1240 Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland 737548 Section de psychologie (PSICO) author Chopin Adrien Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland 796284 1 10.1167/tvst.12.3.1 36857068 2164-2591 PMC9987163 https://tvst.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2785406 Purpose: To describe two new stereoacuity tests: the eRDS v6 stereotest, a global dynamic random dot stereogram (dRDS) test, and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test version 2 (VV), a local or “contour” stereotest for virtual reality (VR) headsets; and to evaluate the tests’ reliability, validity compared to a dRDS standard, and learning effects. Methods: Sixty-four subjects passed a battery of stereotests, including perceiving depth from RDS. Validity was evaluated relative to a tablet-based dRDS reference test, ASTEROID. Reliability and learning effects were assessed over six sessions. Results: eRDS v6 was effective at measuring small thresholds (<10 arcsec) and had a moderate correlation (0.48) with ASTEROID. Across the six sessions, test-retest reliability was good, varying from 0.84 to 0.91, but learning occurred across the first three sessions. VV did not measure stereoacuities below 15 arcsec. It had a weak correlation with ASTEROID (0.27), and test-retest reliability was poor to moderate, varying from 0.35 to 0.74; however, no learning occurred between sessions. Conclusions: eRDS v6 is precise and reliable but shows learning effects. If repeated three times at baseline, this test is well suited as an outcome measure for testing interventions. VV is less precise, but it is easy and rapid and shows no learning. It may be useful for testing interventions in patients who have no global stereopsis. Translational Relevance: eRDS v6 is well suited as an outcome measure to evaluate treatments that improve adult stereodepth perception. VV can be considered for screening patient with compromised stereovision. Dewey 150 Swiss National Science Foundation Cognitive Enhancements: Mechanisms and Limits 178814 CH Projects Agence nationale de la recherche Vieillissement visuel sain et pathologique, cognition spatiale, autonomie – SILVERSIGHT II ANR-18-CHIN-0002 Agence nationale de la recherche Enabling Vision Restoration ANR-18-IAHU-01 Agence nationale pour la recherche Des sens pour toute la vie ANR-10-LABX-65 108 Section de psychologie 71 false 1373 Brain & Learning Lab Translational vision science & technology 12 3 e6ff77c7-9b9b-46d8-ab27-641bd11fac73 Article (Published version) Public i2164-2591-12-3-1_1677663061.89062.pdf 1643353 application/pdf CC BY-NC-ND-4.0 295f28968d30baa808de7970df9b5efe4eabe6613bdec573a9f1468d80400a60 openAccess Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l'éducation / Section de psychologie

Title	Published in	Year	Views	Downloads

The eRDS v6 Stereotest and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test: Two New Tests of Stereoscopic Vision	Translational vision science & technology	2023	132	636
Le contrôle de la vergence oculaire et la vision stéréoscopique fine : une étude sur le lien subtil de ces deux capacités visuelles		2022	87	0

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Tarello, Demetrio