Rethinking Reader and Writer Responsibility in Academic English

Article Article scientifique Article Rethinking Reader and Writer Responsibility in Academic English eng 2015-02-27 2015 author Mackenzie Ian University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland 135360 1-21 10.1515/applirev-2015-0001 1868-6303 https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2015-0001/html There is a growing perception that English used as a lingua franca does not need to resemble English as a native language, but can include a great deal of lexicogrammatical variation. However, a more fundamental matter is whether research articles written in English need to conform to the dominant linear, deductive, ‘Anglo’ pattern of text organization, or whether non-native English speakers should be free to transfer rhetorical patterns from their L1s into English, such as, e.g., an inductive, indirect, end-weighted form of argumentation, perhaps with a less-assertive conclusion. Hinds (1987) describes the latter style of writing as “reader-responsible,” as opposed to the “writer-responsible” Anglo-American style, arguing that it requires a great deal more inferential work on the part of the reader. Yet from a relevance theory perspective it appears unlikely that a culture would choose to impose unnecessary additional processing effort on readers. The perception of difficulty is an etic perspective: analysts from “writer-responsible” cultures imagine the processing effort that would be necessary in their culture to make sense of “reader-responsible” texts. Indirect, inductive rhetorical styles do not cause problems for readers accustomed to them. Given that most academic writing in English is for an international audience, non-native English-speaking researchers – and indeed native English speakers too – should be free to adopt a range of styles, or some sort of heterogeneous hybrid, depending on their perceptions of their readers’ expectations. A further issue is whether researchers who have reservations about ‘Anglo’ styles of writing, e.g. in the social sciences or literary and cultural theory, should encourage non-native English speakers to imitate the noun-heavy, nominalized, passivized, syntactically-complex style dominant in these fields. Academic English English as a lingua franca Contrastive rhetoric Reader responsibility Writer responsibility Dewey 418.02 111 Département de traduction 91 false Applied linguistics review 6 1 8d48486a-c03a-4599-acd5-f55b8d818a57 Article (Published version) Public Article_scientifique_from_crossref.pdf 411707 application/pdf OA NATIONAL 77aa1e705c014d1a78cde465894a47e243221281bb11c33e036d77a07e3e0820 openAccess Faculté de traduction et d'interprétation / Département de traduction

Title	Published in	Access level	OA Policy	Year	Views	Downloads

Rethinking Reader and Writer Responsibility in Academic English	Applied linguistics review			2015	51	45

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Mackenzie, Ian