en
Scientific article
English

Enteral vs. parenteral nutrition for the critically ill patient: a combined support should be preferred

Published inCurrent opinion in critical care, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 408-414
Publication date2008
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current recommendations suggest starting enteral feeding as soon as possible whenever the gastrointestinal tract is functioning. The disadvantage of enteral support is that insufficient energy and protein coverage can occur. This review focuses on some recent findings regarding the nutritional support of critically ill patients and evaluates the data presented. RECENT FINDINGS: An increasing nutritional deficit during a long ICU stay is associated with increased morbidity (infection rate, wound healing, mechanical ventilation, length of stay, duration of recovery), and costs. Evidence shows that enteral nutrition can result in underfeeding and that nutritional goals are frequently reached only after 1 week. Contrary to former beliefs, recent meta-analyses of ICU studies showed that parenteral nutrition is not related to a surplus mortality and may even be associated with improved survival. SUMMARY: Early enteral nutrition is recommended for critically ill patients. Supplemental parenteral nutrition combined with enteral nutrition can be considered to cover the energy and protein targets when enteral nutrition alone fails to achieve the caloric goal. Whether such a combined nutritional support provides additional benefit on the overall outcome has to be proven in further studies on clinical outcome, including physical and cognitive functioning, quality of life, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility.

Keywords
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Critical Illness
  • Enteral Nutrition
  • Humans
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Parenteral Nutrition
  • Quality of Life
Citation (ISO format)
HEIDEGGER, Claudia Paula, DARMON, Patrice, PICHARD, Claude. Enteral vs. parenteral nutrition for the critically ill patient: a combined support should be preferred. In: Current opinion in critical care, 2008, vol. 14, n° 4, p. 408–414. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283052cdd
Main files (1)
Article (Accepted version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal1531-7072
551views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation09/15/2009 10:28:00 AM
First validation09/15/2009 10:28:00 AM
Update time03/14/2023 3:11:32 PM
Status update03/14/2023 3:11:32 PM
Last indexation05/02/2024 11:16:20 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack