Scientific article
Open access

English Overt and Null Complementizers

Published inStudies in generative grammar, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 515-533
Publication date2017

Most studies on the distribution of the null complementizers in English assume that overt that clauses and null that clauses have the identical underlying structure, where the overt/null COMP represents a C head (Stowell 1981, a.o.). This predicts that both overt and null that clauses show (nearly) the same syntactic distribution, contrary to fact. This paper explores a new outlook of overt and null complementizers in clausal complements of both non-factive and factive predicates in English, building on the assumptions that (i) feature specification on C differs from language to language and (ii ) languages also differ as to lexicalizing a subset of these features on C. Adopting Rizzi's (1997) split CP structure with two C heads, Force and Finiteness, we suggest that null that clauses are FinPs, whereas overt that clauses have an extra functional layer above FinP, lexicalizing either the Force head under non-factive predicates or the light demonstrative head d under factive predicates. These three different underlying structures also successfully account for different syntactic patterns found between overt and null that clauses in various contexts.

  • (null) complementizer
  • Factive
  • Non-factive
  • Clausal
  • Complements
  • Main clause phenomena
Citation (ISO format)
SHIM, Ji Young, IHSANE, Tabea. English Overt and Null Complementizers. In: Studies in generative grammar, 2017, vol. 27, n° 3, p. 515–533. doi: 10.15860/sigg.27.3.201708.515
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
ISSN of the journal0167-4331

Technical informations

Creation03/11/2021 9:37:00 AM
First validation03/11/2021 9:37:00 AM
Update time03/16/2023 12:16:08 AM
Status update03/16/2023 12:16:07 AM
Last indexation05/06/2024 6:49:18 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack