UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:106290  next document
add to browser collection

Ethics of nudges: A general framework with a focus on shared preference justifications

Published in Journal of Moral Education. 2018, p. 1-17
Abstract Nudges are soft interventions designed to influence human behaviour. They are increasingly used by policymakers around the world and generate heated controversies over their ethical acceptability. In this article, I depict nudges as science-based technologies, point to new ethical responsibilities they raise—when they are used but also when they are not used—and to the necessity of establishing clear evaluation criteria. I then elaborate a four-level framework for evaluating the acceptability of particular nudges. The second part of the article focuses specifically on 'shared preference justifications' (SPJ), that is, arguments of the sort 'nudges help people make better choices as judged by themselves'. I explain why constructing SPJs is important but difficult and propose a framework for doing so. This framework takes autonomy concerns seriously without overstating them and provides a conceptual basis for the development of nudge evaluation procedures easily applicable by decision-makers.
Keywords nudgeethicsmoralautonomyshared preference justification (SPJ)
Full text
Article (Accepted version) (259 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Research group Ethique et science (1008)
(ISO format)
CLAVIEN, Christine. Ethics of nudges: A general framework with a focus on shared preference justifications. In: Journal of Moral Education, 2018, p. 1-17. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2017.1408577 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:106290

405 hits



Deposited on : 2018-07-09

Export document
Format :
Citation style :