en
Scientific article
Open access
English

Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial

Published inCritical care, vol. 19, 91
Publication date2015
Abstract

A systemic anticoagulation is often required to prevent circuit and filter clotting in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). A regional citrate-based anticoagulation (RCA) does not induce a systemic anticoagulation and prolongs the filter lifespan, but metabolic side-effects have been associated with this therapy. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with patients requiring CRRT to determine whether RCA using a balanced predilution replacement fluid is more effective than heparin in terms of renal replacement delivered dose and safety profile.

Keywords
  • Acute Kidney Injury/drug therapy
  • Aged
  • Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
  • Blood Coagulation
  • Citrates/therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Filtration
  • Heparin/therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Replacement Therapy/methods
  • Survival Rate
Citation (ISO format)
STUCKER, Fabien Jérôme et al. Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. In: Critical care, 2015, vol. 19, p. 91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0822-z
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal1364-8535
508views
191downloads

Technical informations

Creation11/24/2016 1:14:00 PM
First validation11/24/2016 1:14:00 PM
Update time03/15/2023 1:02:13 AM
Status update03/15/2023 1:02:13 AM
Last indexation01/16/2024 10:29:26 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack