en
Scientific article
English

Composite resin vs resin cement for luting of indirect restorations: Comparison of solubility and shrinkage behavior

Published inDental materials journal, vol. 32, no. 5, p. 834-838
Publication date2013
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate relationship between shrinkage development and early solubility of two commonly used luting materials, a self-adhesive cement (GCem chemical and light cured) and composite resin (Tetric). Linear displacement, shrinkage forces and leaching of UDMA from specimens immersed in 75% ethanol/25% water were measured. The least amount of linear shrinkage (33.0±2.9 μm) and polymerization force (4.1±0.3 kg) was observed in Tetric. UDMA leaching (% μg/mL) was the following: chemically cured GCem (4.2±0.2)>light cured GCem (1.5±0.1)>Tetric (0.1). Shrinkage development in the early stages of polymerization was much slower in the self-cured specimens in respect to light cured ones. With the chemically cured self-adhesive cement, incomplete materials' setting during the initial stages after polymerization favored monomer leaching from the cements' mass.

Keywords
  • Solubility
  • Shrinkage
  • Self-adhesive
  • Resin composite
  • Luting
Citation (ISO format)
BORTOLOTTO IBARRA, Tissiana et al. Composite resin vs resin cement for luting of indirect restorations: Comparison of solubility and shrinkage behavior. In: Dental materials journal, 2013, vol. 32, n° 5, p. 834–838. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-153
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0287-4547
535views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation12/23/2013 3:29:00 PM
First validation12/23/2013 3:29:00 PM
Update time03/14/2023 8:47:34 PM
Status update03/14/2023 8:47:33 PM
Last indexation01/16/2024 8:43:25 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack